2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1967 Mazda Familia
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Familia. (57 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 510 kg more than 1967 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Familia. (82 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1967 Mazda Familia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tracker | Familia |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 82 Nm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 57 L |