2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1967 MG 1100
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1967 MG 1100. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1967 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 460 kg more than 1967 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG 1100. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1967 MG 1100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | MG |
Model | Tracker | 1100 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 94 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2380 mm |