2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1969 Lotus Elan. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1969 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 411 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Tracker | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 146 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 72.8 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 889 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 59 L |