2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1969 Skoda 110 L
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Skoda 110 L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Skoda 110 L would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1969 Skoda 110 L. (43 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1969 Skoda 110 L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 495 kg more than 1969 Skoda 110 L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Skoda 110 L. (70 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Skoda 110 L.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1969 Skoda 110 L | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Tracker | 110 L |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 70 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 68.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 68 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 31 L |