2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1969 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 2000. (90 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 50 kg more than 1969 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1969 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Tracker | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |