2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1970 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (247 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 164 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (482 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1970 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 5763 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 482 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1464 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2830 mm |