2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1970 Honda 1300
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Honda 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Honda 1300 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1970 Honda 1300. (81 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1970 Honda 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 405 kg more than 1970 Honda 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Honda 1300. (106 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Honda 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1970 Honda 1300 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Tracker | 1300 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 106 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 75.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 35 L |