2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1972 Fiat X1-9
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Fiat X1-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Fiat X1-9 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1972 Fiat X1-9. (74 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Fiat X1-9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 420 kg more than 1972 Fiat X1-9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Fiat X1-9. (98 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Fiat X1-9.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1972 Fiat X1-9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Tracker | X1-9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 98 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 47 L |