2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1972 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1972 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Holden Belmont weights approximately 40 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Holden Belmont (229 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1972 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1972 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Tracker | Belmont |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 229 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2830 mm |
