2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1972 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1972 Opel Ascona. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 390 kg more than 1972 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Opel Ascona. (90 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1972 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
| Model | Tracker | Ascona |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2440 mm |
