2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1972 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1972 Reliant Rebel. (31 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Reliant Rebel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 725 kg more than 1972 Reliant Rebel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Reliant Rebel. (53 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Reliant Rebel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1972 Reliant Rebel | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Reliant |
| Model | Tracker | Rebel |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 31 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 53 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 60.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 61 mm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2270 mm |
