2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1972 Steyr 126
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Steyr 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Steyr 126 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1972 Steyr 126. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Steyr 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 733 kg more than 1972 Steyr 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1972 Steyr 126 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Steyr |
| Model | Tracker | 126 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1850 mm |
