2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1972 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Tracker | LJ 20 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 37 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |