2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 448 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tracker | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 135 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 65 L |