2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1975 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1975 Toyota Corona. (84 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1975 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 300 kg more than 1975 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Toyota Corona. (135 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1975 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Tracker | Corona |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 84 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 135 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 77 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |