2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1979 Datsun 280
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1979 Datsun 280. (140 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1979 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 95 kg more than 1979 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Datsun 280. (202 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Datsun 280.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1979 Datsun 280 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Datsun |
Model | Tracker | 280 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 202 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 79 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 80 L |