2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1979 Datsun 280

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1979 Datsun 280. (140 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1979 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 95 kg more than 1979 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Datsun 280. (202 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Datsun 280.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Tracker 1979 Datsun 280
Make Chevrolet Datsun
Model Tracker 280
Year Released 2004 1979
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2491 cc 2753 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 165 HP 140 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 202 Nm
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 79 mm
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1300 kg 1205 kg
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4350 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2490 mm 2330 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 80 L