2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1980 Ferrari Mondial
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ferrari Mondial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ferrari Mondial would be higher. At 2,927 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ferrari Mondial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Ferrari Mondial (214 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Ferrari Mondial should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ferrari Mondial weights approximately 100 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Ferrari Mondial (243 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1980 Ferrari Mondial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1980 Ferrari Mondial | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
Model | Tracker | Mondial |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2927 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 214 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 243 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 71 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2710 mm |