2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 55 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1982 Chrysler E | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
| Model | Tracker | E |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 228 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2630 mm |
