2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1982 Ford Granada
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1982 Ford Granada. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 65 kg more than 1982 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Granada. (119 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1982 Ford Granada | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | Granada |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1591 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2780 mm |
