2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1982 Zastava 132
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 202 kg more than 1982 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1982 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Tracker | 132 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1098 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2560 mm |
