2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1983 Chrysler Laser
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 165 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1983 Chrysler Laser | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Tracker | Laser |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 162 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2470 mm |