2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1983 Nissan Leopard
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Leopard. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Leopard. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 195 kg more than 1983 Nissan Leopard. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Leopard. (147 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Leopard.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1983 Nissan Leopard | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Tracker | Leopard |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1770 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2630 mm |
