2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Acura Integra. (139 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1986 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
| Model | Tracker | Integra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4355 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2520 mm |
