2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1986 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1986 Opel Omega. (122 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1986 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 25 kg more than 1986 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Opel Omega. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1986 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
| Model | Tracker | Omega |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 75 L |
