2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1989 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,157 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1989 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Falcon weights approximately 120 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Falcon (236 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1989 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1989 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3157 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2800 mm |
