2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1990 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,594 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1990 Opel Omega. (149 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1990 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Opel Omega weights approximately 165 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Opel Omega (224 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1990 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1990 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
| Model | Tracker | Omega |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1465 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2740 mm |
