2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1990 Toyota Model F
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Toyota Model F would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1990 Toyota Model F. (76 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1990 Toyota Model F.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Toyota Model F. (140 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Toyota Model F.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1990 Toyota Model F | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Tracker | Model F |
Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 140 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 78 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2240 mm |