2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1992 Chrysler ES

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 148 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications: