2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1995 Opel Tigra
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Opel Tigra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Opel Tigra would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1995 Opel Tigra. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1995 Opel Tigra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 245 kg more than 1995 Opel Tigra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Opel Tigra. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Opel Tigra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1995 Opel Tigra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Tracker | Tigra |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 81.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2430 mm |