2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (144 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 220 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
| Model | Tracker | 200 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 144 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 89.3 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |
