2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2004 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Tracker | XU 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |