2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1996 Toyota Chaser
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Chaser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Chaser would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Chaser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Chaser weights approximately 97 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Toyota Chaser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1996 Toyota Chaser | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Tracker | Chaser |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1373 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
