2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1997 Ford Contour
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Contour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Contour would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Contour (200 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Contour weights approximately 90 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Contour (231 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1997 Ford Contour | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Contour |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 231 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 55 L |