2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1997 Mitsubishi Magna. (141 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1997 Mitsubishi Magna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 70 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mitsubishi Magna. (205 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1997 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Tracker | Magna |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 100 mm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2730 mm |
