2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1998 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (235 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Falcon weights approximately 280 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Falcon (395 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1998 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1998 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 395 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2800 mm |