2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1998 Honda SSM
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda SSM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda SSM would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 1998 Honda SSM is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Honda SSM (286 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1998 Honda SSM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1998 Honda SSM | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Tracker | SSM |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 286 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2580 mm |