2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1999 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1999 Volvo C70. (161 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1999 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Volvo C70 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Volvo C70 (230 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1999 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 1999 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Tracker | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 77 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 68 L |