2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Montero would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Montero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi Montero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Montero weights approximately 605 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi Montero (309 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi Montero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Mitsubishi Montero | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Tracker | Montero |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 309 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 90 L |
