2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Sentra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Sentra would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Sentra. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Sentra.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Sentra. (176 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Sentra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Nissan Sentra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Tracker | Sentra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 176 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 73 L |