2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Proton Saloon
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton Saloon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton Saloon would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2000 Proton Saloon. (82 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton Saloon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Proton Saloon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton Saloon. (109 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton Saloon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Proton Saloon | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Proton |
| Model | Tracker | Saloon |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 109 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2390 mm |
