2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Golf would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Golf. (73 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Golf. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 140 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Golf. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Golf. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Golf.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Tracker | Golf |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 126 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 75.6 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2520 mm |