2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2001 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Omega weights approximately 434 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Opel Omega. (209 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2001 Opel Omega | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Tracker | Omega |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 209 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 94.6 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 75 L |