2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 290 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Tracker | Camaro |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 305 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2570 mm |