2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 471 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2002 Holden HSV | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Tracker | HSV |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 5698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 692 Nm |
