2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2002 Vauxhall Omega
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Vauxhall Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Vauxhall Omega would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2002 Vauxhall Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2002 Vauxhall Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Vauxhall Omega weights approximately 365 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Vauxhall Omega. (209 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Vauxhall Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2002 Vauxhall Omega | |
Make | Chevrolet | Vauxhall |
Model | Tracker | Omega |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 209 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2740 mm |