2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2003 Citroen C2
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 300 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (120 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2003 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Tracker | C2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 120 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 77 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 41 L |