2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 310 kg more than 2003 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2003 Proton 400 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Proton |
| Model | Tracker | 400 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |
