2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 933 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Westfield |
| Model | Tracker | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1373 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2320 mm |
