2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Ford Ka
To start off, both 2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Ford Ka were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 5650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 195 kg more than 2004 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ka. (135 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Ford Ka | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Ka |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 135 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 75.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 59 L |