2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, both 2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Land Rover Discovery were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Discovery is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Discovery (217 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Discovery should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Discovery (407 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Discovery will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Land Rover Discovery | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Tracker | Discovery |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 4556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 93 L |
